Somebody Tell The Muslims To “Grow Up”

protesters


 


I fully understand that international diplomacy is a very complex issue, involving a lot of factors and the game of geopolitics is one of give and take.

With that said, however, it is also important to remember that the fundamental purpose of American embassies are to advance the cause of America – and no one else.  May sound harsh to someone reared in the 21st century public schools, but that’s the facts.

Last night I spent hours reading Twitter conversations between the American Embassy in Cairo, Egypt and Muslim extremists, who were begging the embassy to “do something about the so-called movie which makes fun of Islam.”  Answering each of their concerns, the embassy would attempt to placate the angered Tweeters and apologize for the movie, “condemning it” and going above and beyond in their attempts to ensure the angry crowd of Twitter followers that the American government despises the movie just as much as they do.

Shortly thereafter, a band of savages attacked our embassies, leaving four Americans dead, including an ambassador, who was reportedly sodomized by the very same people who oppose the fundamental rights of gays to even breathe air.  Following the attacks millions around the world have sought to excuse the acts of violence due to the bigotry found in the low budget movie that none of us had even heard of prior to Tuesday.

We now have US officials, including Secretary of State Clinton, condemning the movie and apologizing to the world for our constitutional value of freedom of speech.

If I had a platform to reach the Arab world, however, I would be saying something entirely different – I would be telling them that we as Americans owe them no apologies and that it’s time for them to “Grow Up”.

Dear Extremist Muslim,

How dare you get “outraged” over some low budget movie no one in this country even cared about or would have even watched had you not acted like a pathetic two year old.  How dare you threaten a mentally challenged Christian girl in Pakistan with death because she blasphemed your unholy, murderous, rapist, lying, demon possessed “prophet” Muhammad.  How dare you stone homosexuals, then rape our Ambassador.  How dare you cry that a movie “hurts your feelings” when your people hijacked four of our own airplanes and crashed them into symbols of our nation – killing thousands in a single day, and destroying thousands of other lives for years to come.  How dare you ask that my country forsake its constitution and centuries old right to freedom of speech (a right our great grandfathers stormed the beaches of Normandy to preserve) when you’re too pathetic to even allow those with differing views to even live.  You people are the ones who owe apologies, not us.

At the end of the day, Muslims in America, London and the middle east need to recognize that this isn’t 700AD and if you want a driver’s license you’re going to have to remove the head covering so the police officer can actually see your face when he pulls you over.  If you don’t want to see pork don’t go to Pizza Hut.  If your unwed daughter gets pregnant you don’t have the right to kill her simply because she embarrassed you.  And if you don’t like a movie, don’t watch it.

As a Christian I’m “offended” by certain movies nearly every day, but I’m an adult and instead of killing and raping people I do something completely foreign to you – I simply choose not to watch it.

If George W. Bush, Barack H. Obama, Hillary R. Clinton and the rest of our policy makers would have told the Muslim world to simply “get over it” a long time ago and state once and make no apologies that in America we have the freedom to make stupid movies that put down any, all, or no religions; rather than apologize for being free, we wouldn’t be in the mess we’re in right now.  I would to God our government would realize the only language these people understand is spoken by an m-16.

At the end of the day, the civilized world is being bullied by a band of savages trying to take us back to the dark ages, under the rule of a book written by a man who raped a 12 year old.  No thank you.  This is America and we are the land of the free, yes, even free to put down your pathetic religion.

Dear Atheists, Lose Your Self-Righteousness

t square tank


 

It generally doesn’t take very long following a major tragedy for those who profess no religious affiliation whatsoever to link the most recent terrible event in the world to Christianity.

My Facebook page, Twitter profile, website and email have all been blown up by atheists wishing to take jabs at “organized religion,” lumping all Christians, Jews and Muslims into the same cart; acting as though we’re all the same – nothing more than a ruthless band of savages running around killing anyone who doesn’t agree with us.

Each of these individuals desire a 100% secular, atheistic society for both America and all the nations of the world.  This, they are confident would solve all the world’s problems, create a society where everyone prospers and establish “equal rights for all.”

“If only such a place existed…” They fantasize to themselves.

Only one small problem – the world has seen several 100% atheistic countries and frankly, I haven’t came across one that anyone in their right mind would choose to live in – even those who desire to live in the imaginary land.  History and current events reveal that citizens of these lands are treated the worst of all the peoples of the globe.

Communism, at its core is atheism. In fact, at the root of communism one will find all the core components of liberalism – Big government, godlessness, socialized everything – the classic nanny state that the present day DNC is committed to creating.

So what is the track record of countries dedicated to Atheism?

Take a raft south to Cuba and find out how perfect, prosperous, and peaceful an atheistic nation is (be careful not to hit any of the hundreds of rafts travelling north though – they simply couldn’t handle all of Castro’s equality):
“After a week, I decided religion wasn’t for me.” –Fidel Castro

The Miami Herald says that more than 4,000 were killed by Fidel Castro’s firing squads. Many others drowned trying to leave Cuba.  The exact body count is elusive, but experts who keep track of those killed as a result of Castro’s revolution know this much: During his nearly five decades in power, the toll kept mounting.

Armando Lago, a Cuban exile and economist who made a personal quest of counting the people who lost their lives as a direct consequence of Castro, estimates the total at well over 100,000.

Granted, that’s just one example of a nation whose official religion is atheism, so let’s move on…  to say… umm… China.

The People’s Republic of China was established in 1949 and since then the government has been officially atheist. For much of its early history, the country maintained a hostile attitude toward religion. Houses of worship, including temples, mosques, and churches, were seized and converted into non-religious buildings for secular use.

Over this past summer, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (Democrat) referenced China’s many human rights violations, exclaiming that the Chinese government and governments like it are “taking the world backwards.”

Human rights violations is synonomous with the present atheistic Chinese government – including the torture, murder and rape of the nation’s own citizens. Recently, one Chinese woman had gotten pregnant with a second child (which in and of itself is against the law for commoners in atheist-China) refused to get an abortion.  Her home was broke into by Chinese police, who stompped and beat her stomach in an attempt to cause a miscarriage, before arresting her and forcing her to have an abortion.

The woman’s husband stated the following:

“They held her hands behind her back and pushed her head against the wall and kicked her in the stomach,’ he said. ‘I don’t know if they were trying to give her a miscarriage.  ‘Our ten-year-old daughter has been excited about having a little brother or sister but I don’t know how I can explain to her what has happened.   He recalled how a month before the child was due to be born officials told the couple they weren’t allowed to have another baby because they already have a daughter.  His wife, who was filmed in hospital with large bruises on her arms and her dead child still inside her, said: ‘I have had this baby, feeling it moving around and around my belly. Can you imagine how I feel now.’”

Experts estimate that the Chinese athesit government is responsible for over 40million people in its short history.

So much for equal rights in the world’s largest nation, whose official religion is atheism…  But isn’t that Truett Cathy one wicked man?

State atheism in Albania was taken to an extreme during the totalitarian regime installed after World War II, when religions, identified as imports foreign to Albanian culture, were banned altogether.

The Agrarian Reform Law of August 1945 nationalized most property of religious institutions, including the estates of monasteries, orders, and dioceses. Many clergy and believers were tried, tortured, and executed.  All Roman Catholic priests, monks, and nuns were expelled in 1946.

In February 1948 Communists seized power in Czechoslovakia, their agenda included combating “a dangerous ideological enemy holding enormous influence on the masses”, a reference to Christianity. In pursuance of this aim, the houses of religious were seized by the State Security Service (StB) in three “barbaric nights” in 1950, forcibly moving a total of 3,142 people into “concentration monasteries”. In the case of the male religious, these were virtually turned into prison camps or labour camps secured with guards and imposing a strict regime aimed at the “political re-education” of the religious. The 213 buildings and facilities seized were confiscated and the contents of many valuable ancient libraries that survived even Turko-Tatar attacks in the Middle Ages were used for making cardboard.

In 1957, the Czech government arrested university students in the eastern Slovakia town of Košice who were holding Bible study meetings. The consequent investigations led to further arrests of Christians and trials in 1959 not open to the public but covered by state-controlled media, which presented information under false and misleading headlines in order to turn the nation at large against Christians.  The arrested members were found guilty of “spreading the hostile Christian ideology” and “opposing scientific Marxist ideology” and were sentenced pursuant to a law against subversion of the Republic…  But those Christians who oppose homosexual marraige are the real intolerant ones aren’t they?

Of course everyone who has but a basic understanding of history knows all too well what life was like in Soviet Russia.

State atheism in the Soviet Union was known as “gosateizm”, and was based on the ideology of Marxism–Leninism. As the founder of the Soviet state Vladimir Lenin put it:
“Religion is the opiate of the people: this saying of Marx is the cornerstone of the entire ideology of Marxism about religion. All modern religions and churches, all and of every kind of religious organizations are always considered by Marxism as the organs of bourgeois reaction, used for the protection of the exploitation and the stupefaction of the working class.”

Marxism-Leninism has consistently advocated the control, suppression, and, ultimately, the elimination of religion. Within about a year of the revolution the state expropriated all church property, including the churches themselves, and in the period from 1922 to 1926, 28 Russian Orthodox bishops and more than 1,200 priests were killed (a much greater number was subjected to persecution).

From the late 1920s to the late 1930s, such organizations as the League of the Militant Godless ridiculed all religions and harassed believers with the support of the government. Anti-religious and atheistic propaganda was implemented into every portion of soviet life, in schools, communist organizations (such as the Young Pioneer Organization), and the media. Soviet leaders eventually changed the calendar in order to ensure that a “holiday will seldom fall on Sunday.”

In 1937 Soviet troops invaded the sovereign nation of Mongolia, where they iniated a whole-scale attack on the Buddhist religion. At the same time, Stalinist-style purges took place in the Communist Party and in the Mongolian army. Mongolia’s new leader was a follower of Joseph Stalin who emulated many of the policies Stalin had implemented in the Soviet Union. The purges led to the almost complete eradiction of Lamaism in the country, and cost an estimated 30,000–35,000 lives.

R.J. Rummel, writes in his book, “Death by Government”:

“With this understood, the Soviet Union appears the greatest megamurderer of all, apparently killing near 61,000,000 people. Stalin himself is responsible for almost 43,000,000 of these.”

The wonderful land of North Korea is also “officially atheist”… Sounds exactly what we need to emmulate in this country doesn’t it?
North Korea’s government exercises virtual total control over society and imposes state sanctioned atheism, the cult of personality of Kim Jung Il and Kim Il Sung, described as a political religion. Although the North Korean constitution states that freedom of religion is permitted, free religious activities no longer exist in North Korea as the government sponsors religious groups only to create an illusion of religious freedom.

North Korean’s atheist rulers have made things so bad in the nation, stealing all the people’s possessions, that children in the country are forced to eat grass.

And yet you have the nerve to critize relgious people for being the only ones prone to violence.

And yet you have the nerve to say that if society continues down the path of liberalism, toward atheism, America and the world would be a far better place.

Dear atheist, you should be ashamed of yourself for following an ideology that hasn’t worked in a single nation of the globe and has killed more people over the past century than those who claim “Christianity” have in the past three centuries.

Liberals and atheists in particular like to assume a “higher, more righteous” position when it comes to matters of great tragedy – pretending to be above the petty backbiting of those who claim religion.

The facts, however, reveal a totally different story.  Whether it’s the past one-hundred years of human history of the past twenty years of mass shootings in America, you will find far more atheists and liberals involved than those who define “mainstream culture” would have you believe, including: the Columbine shooters (atheists), the Colorado theater shooter (member of Occupy Wall Street), and Adolf Hitler, who was a socialist.

The simple facts are these: People kill innocents in the name of Islam (following the teaching of Muhammad), people kill in the name of Judaism, people kill in the name of “Christianity” and people kill in the name of atheism… Because at the end of the day, as any person in law enforcement will tell you (as does the Word of God), man is wicked by nature.

You can find countless examples of each of these above named groups killing people on mass levels, which is my point altogether and destroys your point altogether.

Like it or not, but inside you dwelleth no good thing and you, yes even you and those who share your views are capable of doing unspeakle things. Christ’s purpose in coming was twofold: To forgive the actions of our old man and to make each willing person a new man.

Stop Saying Islam Is a Religion of Peace

Stop Defending the Terrorists


 

As a Christian, I find myself being criticized for my religious beliefs in one form or another on a near daily basis. As a Christian, I have been cursed for my religious beliefs, known of several movies that blatantly criticize my faith and my Savior. There have been several books, cartoons and “documentary films” portraying Christ in a negative light – some in a very grotesque light. To put it simply, blasphemy against my faith is business as usual in 2012 America.

I could go further and tell stories of “artists” who have placed crucifixes in jars of urine to illustrate my points, but if you’ll be honest with yourself no additional examples should be necessary.

Though all these examples “offend” me and to some degree make me mad, I realize that man has been endowed by his Creator with certain unalienable rights – including, in my opinion, the right to speak freely; even if those use that very same right to criticize the One who gave it to them.

Living in America has given me a deep appreciation for this right. Despite it being such an overly used expression I can sincerely say that I may not agree with what you have to say, but I would defend your right to say it until death.

Which brings me to my single point – Islam is not a religion of peace; and both George W. Bush and Barack Hussein Obama have placed every American citizen in great harm by saying that it is.

Ask yourselves these two questions: When is that last time you saw a movie put down the Christian faith? When is the last time Christians in any country have stormed any building and murdered people as a result of a movie or book offending them?

Secondly, ask yourselves the same questions and substitute Muslims for Christians.

The Muslim faith is not nearly the subject of such criticism as the Christian faith in mainstream media, yet there are countless examples of Muslims who have stormed embassies, threatened artists and writers, murdered innocents simply because they have been offended.

The very worst people I can possibly think of who claim to be “Christians” and actually read their Bibles and attend church regularly are those who belong to the Westboro “Baptist” Church; but they are only a single family with no more than fifteen members nationwide – and the very worst thing they do is picket funerals (not that I’m making light of this, but certainly not nearly as wicked as the likes of Al-Quada).

On the other hand, there are hundreds-of-millions of the “extremist” Muslims, who routinely chant in the streets, calling for your children’s deaths simply because of their nationality.

As an American, as a Christian and as someone who believes that freedom of speech is a fundamental right of being human, I am sickened by the statement my nation’s embassy issued yesterday, on the anniversary of the date Muslims attacked my country and murdered my countrymen:
The Embassy of the United States in Cairo condemns the continuing efforts by misguided individuals to hurt the religious feelings of Muslims – as we condemn efforts to offend believers of all religions. Today, the 11th anniversary of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States, Americans are honoring our patriots and those who serve our nation as the fitting response to the enemies of democracy. Respect for religious beliefs is a cornerstone of American democracy. We firmly reject the actions by those who abuse the universal right of free speech to hurt the religious beliefs of others.

As an American, the Constitution of the United States guarantees me freedom of speech without the federal government condemning me and as a Christian, that same Constitution guarantees that I can engage in religious debate and even criticize opposing religions without my government condemning me – The federal government broke both these rules twice in one statement. For what purpose? The purpose of appeasing the very same people who have for nearly 1,500 years been at war with civilization itself.

And to what end? The murder of an American diplomat and three other citizens.

I have not watched the film that apparently “incited” this most recent round of violence, therefore I will not comment regarding its content; however, after watching the events of the past twenty-four hours I must say that I’m very troubled to see society focusing its condemnations upon filmmakers rather than murderers.

No, not all Muslims want to kill you, simply for being you; However, hundreds-of-millions of Muslims do, which is hundreds of millions more than Christians.

Many will say that Muslim terrorists only exists because “we’ve been over there for the past fifty- years,” and tough I certainly agree that American should practice minding its own business every once in a while, such an assertion is false altogether. As Libyan Muslims have been making war against this nation for no legitimate reason for over two hundred years, as this letter from Thomas Jefferson, written to James Adams perfectly illustrates:

“We took the liberty to make some enquiries concerning the ground of their pretensions to make war upon nations who had done them no injury, and observed that we considered all mankind as our friends who had done us no wrong, nor had given us any provocation. The Ambassador [of Tripoli] answered us that it was founded on the Laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and that every Musselman (muslims) who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise.”

As for Muhammed. He was both a murderer and a rapist – not an opinion, but fact.

Five Reasons Why Obama Might Get Spanked In November…

gaymarriage vote

In the past thirty-two years Americans have only booted one President from office – so I fully realize that what I’m about to say is taking a huge leap… And indeed anything can happen between now and Election Day, but despite all of the polls declaring this election to be a dead heat, I fully believe that barring any game-changers Romney will win in a landslide.

I say this not because I’m pulling for Romney, as a matter of fact I can’t stand the guy, but he’s not Obama – and in this election Obama is the central issue.

There are five reasons why I believe that once again, barring any game changers, Obama will be humiliated this November:

#1. The Magic Is Gone
The fall of 2008 can best be remembered for what has become known as “Obamamania”. Can you remember those days? People were getting tattoos of the Obama logo, adults were acting like star-struck teenage girls at a mere glimpse of “The One”, he was literally telling us that his election would cause the “waters to retreat” (no joke, he actually said this) and people actually believed him.

Even my wife and I tuned in to watch Obama speak at the Democratic Convention of 2008 and after it was over the two of us looked at each other with our mouths dropped to the floor in amazement – this guy was good! He was so good that even though we knew better, we really wanted to believe in him and had to work to remind ourselves of this very likable guy’s uber-liberal record.

Fast-forward four years and all that magic is gone; which is critical in determining the winner of this election, because “magic” was all Obama had.

#2. He’s Taking The Black Vote For Granted
In 2008, 95% of all black voters cast their ballots for Obama – yet the President still only managed to garner 52.9% of all votes cast – bottom line: Obama must have an enormous portion of the black vote in order to win this election.

Last May, President Obama did something that in my opinion alienated a large portion of black voters – he came out in full support of gay marriage.

The black population as a whole is far more religious than the white population and far more opposed to gay marriage than their white counterparts. As the following chart from the Pew Research Center will reveal:

African-Americans now know what it’s like to have a President who shares their skin color, and frankly, they’re figuring out that nothing in their lives is any different.

I again see Obama carrying the black vote in this election by enormous margins, but not nearly as high as before… How could he possibly, when the magic of having a black President has been lost and African-Americans have come to the realization that his views are not their own?

#3. The Democratic Party has lost the trust of the American People
“Bush lied people died” “The Republicans are frauds” yadda, yadda, yadda… That was the kind of talk that propelled the Democrats into office in the midterm election of 2006 and swept Obama into office in ’08.

Though the average American did not fully agree with their doctrines or positions, we as a nation, were ready for change and ready for politicians that we could trust (that’s a funny joke!).

Sacrificing our own beliefs in hopes for change – a change we could believe in – a change where we were treated honestly and fairly by the party our grandparents belonged to, Americans jumped Reagan’s ship and hopped aboard a mystery boat.

Six years later we’ve figured out what boat we jumped aboard – the SS Pelosi did not listen to the American people and steamrolled a complete overhaul of our healthcare system without even giving us time to read the tens of thousands of pages associated with it.

Years later, we’re still discovery frightening things within its pages, including laws banning growing a garden and “death panels”. I know that those who remain committed to socialism will be inclined to argue these points with me, but if they had any sense they would keep their mouths closed and listen – as I am telling them why they keep getting beat.

Obama promised a new era in politics where he would govern transparently, openly and fairly. Instead, he has surrounded himself with cons, frauds and terrorists. Instead he has sought to divide us as a nation rather than unite us. Instead he has revealed himself to be every single thing he warned us against.

Solyndra?

To put it simply, after six years of being ruled by Democrats (06-10 in Congress, and 08-12 in the White House) America is unquestionably in worse shape than we were during the darkest days of Republican rule. Russian submarines are patrolling off our coasts, and the most recent stunt the Democratic Party pulled at their own convention, blatantly cheating their fellow party members out of a vote, adding God back into the party’s platform at the request of the majority of Dems was, in my opinion, the straw that broke the camel’s back.

Any person who trusts Obama in today’s age is in a small minority. This doesn’t mean that people trust Romney or the Republicans, but I do believe that between the two the voters of North Carolina and Ohio will take another chance with yet another unknown and cast their votes toward Romney.

#4. His Record is Dismal & He’s Looking Pathetic
Four years ago he looked great. He was young, energetic and seemed able to conquer the world. Obama supporters thought he could accomplish anything.

Now, four years later, the emperor has no clothes. In four years the only thing he can brag on is killing Bin Laden, and he even struggles to do that without sounding arrogant.

While prices have risen steeply, the median household income has dropped under Obama’s administration – meaning things are costing more and people are making less (He delivered on the change, just not the hope).

Under Obama an unprecedented 15% of American families now enjoy food stamps, costing the country $6.025 billion per month. While the unemployment rate has actually fallen from 2009 the amount of participants for the SNAP program has soared – proving what all of us on the right have been saying all along, “this President is a socialist who wants everyone to be on the government payroll.”

Fortunately for the cause of liberty there remains a majority, a very slim majority, but nevertheless a majority of Americans who work hard and give more than they get from the government. This election will be about them, raising their voice and taking back what is rightfully theirs.

#5. Bill Clinton is Obama’s Spokesman
The greatest myth in modern day American history is that Bill Clinton is some overwhelmingly loved individual whom Americans simply adore.

The fact is that in two elections for the White House, President Clinton was not ever able to do what even George W. Bush did – get the majority of voters to vote for him.

Sensing themselves to be in trouble, the Obama campaign has sent out Slick Willy to make the case for O, believing that once Americans see Big Bill on their television screens they’ll be more inclined to vote for Obama.

In the election of 1992 only 43% of Americans wanted Bill Clinton to be their President (That’s only four out of ten people), in 1996 only 49% of voters voted for Clinton. This is huge, because what the Obama people are failing to realize is that Clinton, at no time in his political career, ever garner the support of a majority of America’s voters.

I just don’t see how having such a polarizing figure as Bill Clinton going on the television accusing Romney of wishing to wage a “war against women” will swing any voters. Out of every national politician from both parties I can think of no person who has been more abusive to women, ranging from his own wife to college interns, than Mr. Clinton… Not smart, Obama guys.

The bottom line is that barring any game changers or cheating (which the Dems have already proven they’re capable of doing at their convention) ie voter fraud (yep, I believe these guys are keeping all of their options alive) there is simply no way the Obama campaign will win this election.

I don’t care what the polls say, as polls have proven themselves to be grossly wrong over the years – Obama will lose this election, if it were held today and in a fair manner.  If my name were Lee Cororso I would be putting on the giant Romney head about now.

Obama’s Latest Commercial is an Attack Upon Your Intelligence

Obama commerciajpgl


 

In their undeniable wisdom, our founding fathers devised not a democracy but a Republic.  They have since been criticized for placing so many restrictions upon who was awarded the privilege to vote.  Among those intitial restrictions were: that state legislatures to appoint Senators, an Electoral College (which originally called for voters to elect a trusted member of their community to meet with others across the state in order to select the best candidate for President), and lastly they only wished for property owners to be given the privilege to vote.

We have long been taught that such restrictions were a black eye upon our country’s “democratic form of government” and have since expanded the walls of the tent in an effort to give the common man (or woman) a larger say in government.

Unfortunately, as history so often proves, our founding fathers had it right the first time.

Today, we live in the “Rock the Vote” era of American politics and everyone, ranging from the local baker to YahooNews seems to be saying “It doesn’t matter who you vote for, just get out and vote!”

This sounds noble and correct at first, but when you actually stop and think about it, it is the most idiot sentiment to ever creep upon this land.  For starters, it does matter who you vote for, as elections have consequences.

The sad truth is this – the average American is simply too stupid to make an informed decision as to which candidate they should vote for.  Yes, very harsh, but I’ll stick by this statement until I die!

Don’t believe me? I’ll prove it. Take a look at the past four Presidents our system has produced. Take a look at the moronic jokers (from both parties) serving in Congress this very hour. Take a look at the members of the many state’s legislatures.  They’re all there because voters wanted them there.

Bottom line – we’re living in a day where “stupid” people, who frankly lack the intelligence to hire a decent plumber, have been entrusted with the supreme task of hiring the leader of the free world…

At a time when Russian submarines were patrolling off the coast of Alabama last month, China seems to be on an endless endeavor to establish a Pacific empire, unemployment is unacceptably high, and 15% of our countrymen are receiving food stamps both candidates should be spending every second telling us what their plan is to re-establish our nation’s dominance.  Instead this President Obama’s latest YouTube commerical:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=h7O_ADbgQ8k


 

Blame Socialism For Too Much Money In Politics…

US Capitol


 

The most difficult struggle for any person who wishes to be active in politics is the struggle to remain honest – honest with others as well as being honest with one’s self and to one’s core principles.

Unfortunately, with today’s political climate being more contentious than ever before (with the exception of the Civil War), I find that most, on either side, are far too willing to sacrifice their commonsense just to tow the party line.  This is both a disheartening commentary concerning the condition of the human race as well as the future of American politics.

Being an unapologetic member of the “vast right wing conspiracy” I sometimes find myself in such a predicament.

One such issue that led me to stray from the reservation is on the issue of corporate money in politics.

I believe that the average American would be shocked to discover the amount of money that pours into the coffers of political candidates.

Did you know that in the 2008 election, a total of $5.3 billion were spent on federal elections?  The amount spent on the presidential race alone was $2.4 billion, Obama spent $730 million in his election campaign compared to McCain’s $333 million.

In the 2004 Presidential election, George W. Bush spent $367 million compared to John Kerry’s $328 million.  In 2000, total spending on ads alone for Bush exceeded Gore by $9 million.  Thus, in the last three Presidential elections the candidate who spent the most money won the election.

This year, President Barack H. Obama has raised nearly $300 million dollars, $181 million of which has come from what is classified as “Large Individual Contributions”.  Romney, has raised $154 million, $128 million has come from the hands of “Large Individual Contributors”.

Obama’s largest 2012 contributors include some of the following industries:

Lawyers / Law Firms                       $13.8 million
Education                                            $7.6 million
Healthcare                                          $4.2 million
Securities & Investments             $3.8 million
Entertainment                                  $3.3 million

Romney’s largest 2012 contributors include some of the following industries:

Securities & Investments             $10.4 million
Lawyers / Law Firms                       $5.9 million
Real Estate                                          $5.5 million
Financial Institutions                       $3.8 million

Which leads me to the following question:
Why would law firms be willing to hand over $13.8 million to the President?  Why would securities & investments people be willing to offer up over $10 million to a guy running against the President?

To this question, there is but one possible explanation – they believe that if “their guy” gets elected they will be repaid with more favorable regulations, greater access to government’s vast stockpile of “free money” or opportunities to enjoy government contracts.  In essence they are purchasing our nation’s leaders.

To illustrate this, we will use one of the more recent “coincidences” regarding money in politics:

In 2008, a man named Steven Spinner raised at least half a million dollars for Obama’s campaign.  As a way to say “thank you,” he was named a stimulus adviser for the US Department of Energy, a job where he helped the administration determine which companies and organizations should be awarded tax payer money through the president’s stimulus package.

Among the companies Spinner advocated for receiving tax payer money was a company named Solyndra; a now-bankrupt manufacturer of “green energy”.  The Obama administration awarded the corporation a $535-million loan guarantee through the Energy Department.  “Coincidently”, Spinner’s wife just happened to be deeply involved in the company as both a policy adviser and legal aide.

This is just one of thousands of examples where the party in control thanks a supporter by literally multiplying their contributions by ten or even a hundred…  At the tax payer’s expense.

Think I’m being biased or that this is just another instance of the corrupt Democratic Party misusing your money?  Consider this:

In the 2004 Presidential election individuals from the following companies made contributions to the George W. Bush reelection campaign SOURCE:

Morgan Stanley                $603,480
Merrill Lynch                      $586,254
Citigroup Inc                       $320,820
Bank of America               $218,261

Now take a look at some of the recipients of President Bush’s notorious “Too Big to Fail Bailouts” an act that virtually turned America into a socialist nation overnight SOURCE:

10/28/2008

Bank   of America Corp.

Charlotte

N.C.

$15,000,000,000

10/28/2008

Citigroup   Inc.

New   York

N.Y.

$25,000,000,000

10/28/2008

Morgan   Stanley

New   York

N.Y.

$10,000,000,000

1/9/2009

Bank   of America Corp. (Merril Lynch)

Charlotte

N.C.

$10,000,000,000

10/28/2008

Goldman   Sachs Group Inc.

New   York

N.Y.

$10,000,000,000

 

Liberals are always wanting to talk about the corruption that happens on Wall Street and the corruption that goes on in big corporations.  Believing in the total depravity of man, I have no doubt that most of what they are saying is probably true.  However, I can’t help but disagree with them concerning the remedy to this problem.  I do not believe for a second that by surrendering more of the people’s power to the government in order to create more regulations on various industries is the solution – as the government is at its core a group of politicians – who at the end of the day are in the pockets of the very corporations they are threatening to regulate.

What happens when the government is given more power to regulate businesses?  The biggest businesses in a certain industry are the ones who are most capable of producing the largest political contributions in their respective industry.  Thus the business on top corrupts the entire process by purchasing politicians who will not only introduce legislation that is favorable to them, but also unfavorable to their competitors in the same industry – thus creating a monopoly, by allowing only one or a small group of businesses to control an entire sector – simply by issuing government regulations that drive up the prices to stay in business – which always hurt the little guys the most.

We know this to be fact, because we have seen it played out thousands of times over across the nation when local governments attempt to regulate an industry.

Take New York City for example, where, at the request of some of the city’s largest taxi cab operations, city regulators determined that certain taxi cab drivers were engaged in unscrupulous business practices.

To combat this supposed problem, city officials devised the “medallion system,” which basically requires all taxi cabs operating in the city to contain a circular NYC issued medallion on the trunk lid of the car.  How many medallions are presently issued for the city of a population of 8.25 million residence and 50 million annual visitors?   Answer: 13,237.

What is the price to obtain such an item?  Last October two were sold for $1 million dollars each. http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/10/20/2-taxi-medallions-sell-for-1-million-each/

In this instance, we see what happens when government regulators (in the pockets of corporations), introduce socialist policies and invaded a sector of this local market – they basically make it impossible for the “little guy” to even succeed.

Why?  Because the big companies and “evil corporations” as many on the left like to describe them found their ways into the politician’s pockets and in the name of “raising the standard” and “regulating” A 17 mile long cab ride in New York City costs $3.07 per mile, whereas the same trip in DC (an unregulated city) costs $1.90 per mile.

SOURCE: http://dc.taxiwiz.com/?lang=en

Getting rid of the medallion system would instantly do three things: drive down the prices of taxi fares, create thousands of new jobs, and provide higher wages for owner / operators.

So why doesn’t the city get rid of them?  Because most of the owners of the medallions are political contributors.  Hmmm…  Sounds a bit fishy doesn’t?

You see, the greatest misunderstanding about socialism is this – most people believe that under socialism corporations disappear.  That’s not true.  Under socialism corporations and entire sectors are controlled by the politicians who under all forms of government throughout human history have proven to be some of the most corrupt individuals in the history of the world.  Thus, socialism does not eliminate corrupt business practices but rather encourages it.

In a free society business owners have no need to “purchase politicians”, only in societies where the government regulates every action and hands out free money every day is there a need to line the pockets of politicians.

In today’s society government and corporations have gotten too close (that’s obvious to most everyone).  This results in lower wages for the little guy, more corruption, and misuse of tax payer money.  Though I sympathize to some degree with a few of the points made by the Occupy Wall Street protesters as well as many liberals, I can’t help but disagree with them entirely as to the solution to these problems.

Whereas they argue that by giving the government greater control over these corporations we will somehow make these problems disappear, I say that government control over these corporations is exactly what has led to the corporate cronyism to begin with.  Were there no regulations over the taxi cabs in NYC there would be no need for a coziness between the government and huge cab fleets.
Were there no “free money” handouts, Morgan Stanley wouldn’t have had any incentive to rally behind Bush, nor would Solyndra have given Obama a single dime.

True capitalism in a free market, where millions of people are free to write “taxi” on the side of their car and drive down the road picking up any person willing to jump in always breeds wealth from the bottom up – Don’t believe me?  Take a twenty mile taxi ride in DC then go to NYC and take the same ride…  See how much wealth you (the little guy) retained under a free market system vs. a well regulated socialist system.

When there become too many taxi drivers for a city, drivers move or find new professions where they are free to create more wealth for society as a whole.

In a true capitalist society, corporate money has no place in politics and governments answer to the people.  Thus, governments are free to lay down the rules of the business fairly, without respect to any corporation…  Something that simply does not happen under a marriage of corporation and state – a system we refer to as socialism.

The inevitable result of this unholy alliance is a system where governments regulate every minute detail of a business – which gives incentive to a corporation to even be involved in politics in the first place.

Despite the seemingly good intentions of many who advocate for socialism, the cold hard reality is this – even  especially in socialist societies those with money always find the power.

This nation was founded by “we the people”, not we the corporations.  The constitution addresses government’s relationship with the states and their inhabitants.  Corporations have no business buying the people’s representative and would have no incentive to do so, should our elected leaders return to governing constitutionally…  This might explain why our elected leaders are so reluctant to do just that.

Straight Conservatives Deserve Equal Rights Too

conservatives need equal rights too


 

“Equal rights” is the overwhelming theme shouted out by the homosexual community as they make their repulsive attempts to totally redefine what marriage is. Though I have no doubt that they will eventually be successful in redefining what marriage is in the eyes of the general public – I know that scripturally they will suffer great punishment prior to ever changing God’s definition of this most sacred of institutions.

With all this talk of equal rights, however, I’m afraid that the crowd who needs to be the ones demanding to be treated equally are oblivious to the fact that they’re even being discriminated against.

On April 26, 2012, Bailey Brown, a lesbian athletic director went outside her home in Pismo Beach, California, to discover that her car had been spray-painted, scratched and vandalized.

Police and local media immediately labeled the crime as a “hate crime” a description which guarantees harsher punishments and greater police involvement in solving the crime.

Only weeks ago, a similar crime was committed in the State of California. This time against a business for its stance on gay marriage. Despite the fact that the perpetrator damaged property by spray-painting a slur against the business, police treated this individual no different than any other person caught vandalizing a random train car or alley wall. Why? Because the perpetrator was a homosexual and the business (Chick-fil-a) was opposed to redefining marriage.

In similar instances of biasness, there have been other occurrences where homosexuals were targeted, simply because of their views on “sexual orientation” by gunmen. Each time, the shooter is charged with a “hate crime” in addition to being charged with murder / attempted murder, etc.

Yesterday, a gay man named Floyd Corkins (a person who had been volunteering recently at a D.C. community center for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people) approached the D.C. offices of the Family Research Council (A Christian organization opposed to gay marriage). Corkins, who was carrying both a handgun and a Chick-fil-a bag with him, began to fire upon a security guard working at the facility.

After being hit in the arm with a bullet from the suspect’s gun, the guard was able to wrestle the gun from Corkins and held him at gunpoint until police arrived.

As Corkins was held at gunpoint, awaiting the arrival of law enforcement he reportedly begged the security guard not to shoot him, stating, “Don’t shoot me, it was not about you, it was what this place stands for.” – clear evidence that the shooting was purely motivated by the Family Research Council’s views on gay marriage.

Though investigators have left open the door of charging Corkins with “domestic terrorism”, investigators have given no indication that Corkins’ actions may have been a “hate crime”.

All of these incidences reveal to me something I have long suspected, which is this - in the eyes of many prosecutors and liberals, the value of a straight-white-conservative’s life or property is considerably lower than the values of their liberal or minority counterparts – something that flies in the face of everything Martin Luther King, Jr. preached.

In my opinion, murder and attempted murder is the same – regardless of motivations or the victim’s political views. At the end of the day you still have an innocent person with a bullet hole in their side.

If America were a just nation, murderers would be prosecuted for their crime, not the condition of their heart (it obviously wasn’t in a good place or they would have never pulled the trigger). Those found guilty of stealing another human being’s life, regardless of their motivation, deserve nothing less than capital punishment.

If our nation’s justice system ran in such a manner, I have no doubt that, though we would always have murders, we wouldn’t see nearly the number of copycat mass killings (like the one at the Sikh temple) nor would we see the high numbers of “hate crimes” from either side. We’re living in a nation where there truly are very few consequences for any actions… Even murder.

National Weather Service Requests 46,000 Bullets

hollow point

The National Weather Service is saying that a “clerical error” is responsible for an apparent Department of Commerce memo which has surfaced, requesting, 46,000 rounds of “ammunition for semiautomatic pistols to be factory-loaded .40 S&W caliber, 180-grain jacketed hollow point (JHP).”

The National Weather Service operates under the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration which also oversees the National Marine Fisheries Service – the location in which the memo directed the ammunition to be delivered to.

According to Department of Commerce officials the memo, stating “The Department of Commerce NOAA National Weather Service… requires the following items… 16,000 rounds…” was an honest mistake and merely a typo.

This may in fact be the case, but when one takes into consideration that the fact that the NOAA has a history of bizarre funding requests, including a request in May, soliciting $5,000 to purchase a magician for a two-day training conference for entertaining agency personnel, one simply can’t help but view this entire ordeal with a degree of suspicion.

This request also raises eyebrows for two other reasons: 1.) Considering the federal government’s most recent scandal, so called “Fast and Furious”.  The disastrous scheme involved federal officials basically arming Mexican drug cartels with assault rifles with hopes tracking the weapons down to higher profile targets.  Instead, the weapons instantly found their way onto the streets and according to Mexican officials is directly responsible for government assassinations and has been linked to a border patrol agent’s murder.  2.) The request is also troubling considering the fact that the bullets, regardless of which Department of Commerce agency they were intended for, are hollow points – bullets designed to expand upon impact, thus more likely to kill.  Such bullets are so fatal, they are prohibited in use of war by the Hague Convention.  Thus, we can conclude that the bullets were intended for use against American citizens.

Wake Up Stupid People: Unions don’t care about you!

coal mines

In 2008 President Obama made no effort to hide his disdain for the coal industry.  He was even recorded bragging that under his plan, “electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket.” because of his intentions to make coal mining so costly it would eventually become pointless for coal companies to remain in business.

His selection for Vice President, Joe Biden, was equally opposed to mining.  He was filmed lecturing a college student that under the new administration, coal power plants would be banned in America.

Regardless of your opinion as to the environmental consequences of coal mining, you should certainly agree that such policies would be harmful to the personal interests of the ordinary coal miner.

Which brings me to this article’s title – Unions do not care about the workers.

Which candidate do you believe the leader of the United Mine Workers of America, a union comprised of over 100,000 active and retired coal miners endorsed in the Presidential election of 2008?  Common logic would say the candidate whose pick for Vice President travelled the country leading chants declaring “Drill baby, drill!”  Wouldn’t it?

Common logic would tell you they most certainly would not have endorsed the VP who declared “no coal powered plants in this country…”  Wouldn’t it?

However, when it comes to politics, neither side – and especially the Democratic / union side – are not ruled by logic.  In today’s political world dollar signs rule the day.

Thus, Cecil Roberts, the president of the United Mine Workers of America, came out in May of 2008 and openly endorsed Obama for the Presidency:

“It doesn’t matter whether it’s our members’ jobs, their safety, their health care, their pensions… their standard of living, or their very rights as American citizens–John McCain will do harm to all of them by continuing the failed Bush administration policies.”

Oh really?  And all this time, I thought that liberals were always saying that Bush was “in bed with the coal industry.”  That’s interesting.

To put it frankly, Roberts’ ’08 endorsement of Obama had absolutely nothing to do with looking out for the organization’s members financial wellbeing, because if it did, he would not have endorsed the candidate most openly opposed to the very act of coal mining…  It’s pure common sense.

Roberts then spent the next four months travelling the country, persuading coal miners everywhere to sign their own pink slips by voting for Barack Hussein Obama.

Now, here we are, just a handful of weeks from the Presidential election of 2012.

Thousands of coal mining jobs have been lost under the Obama administration, as he continues to unapologetically wage his war against coal.

Yet, according to the Wall Street Journal Roberts now says, “The union might choose not to endorse Mr. Obama and sit out the election instead.”

For starters, if the UMWA is still even considering endorsing Obama they are either: a.) the biggest group of morons ever to walk the face of the globe, or b.) one of the most corrupt organizations in America.

How could the United Mine Workers of America even be on the fence when it comes to this election?  Not that I think that Romney is anything special (I personally disdain him), but certainly believe that in this situation the UMWA has no choice but to do the unthinkable and endorse the Republican candidate for president.  For the American coal miner, this is a situation of life and death…  But the UMWA refuses to even acknowledge this simple truth.

Why?  Because the unions are just another corrupt wing of the crooked alliance between corporate American and big government.

Regardless of what happens to the future of coal, Roberts will always have options.  Unfortunately, the people of Mingo County, West Virginia, the people his union is supposed to look out for do not.

How the USSR Defeated America… From the grave.

USSR FLAG

While speaking to a delegation of capitalist and free nations in November 1956, Soviet premier, Nikita Khrushchev declared, “Whether you like it or not, history is on our side… We will bury you!”

Later, on August 24, 1963, Khrushchev remarked in a speech directed toward the American government “I once said, ‘We will bury you,’ and I got into trouble with it. Of course we will not bury you with a shovel. Your own working class will bury you.”

Though Soviet leaders always prepared for open war against America, their actual goal was to defeat America from the inside out – without firing a single shot.

Just as America had operatives working inside the USSR, so too did the communists have individuals in place, working inside America to promote their ideologies.

The ironic thing, however, is that it was the USSR who was the first nation to be buried in the graveyard of nations – after dying a painful death, brought on by a cancer known as overspending.

As a nation, we were overjoyed at the thought of our country’s longtime enemy finally suffering its rightful demise.

“We’re safe now! We won!” Americans thought to themselves throughout the 90’s. Sure the Soviets said they would bury us, but they’re dead now.

Unfortunately, this was a false sense of security for the American public. For by the time the Soviet Union had actually collapsed, big government socialism, the first step toward outright communism had already infiltrated mainstream thinking in many key positions of American society and culture.

In essence, we too had already been dealt a death blow by our enemy and hadn’t even realized it.

Even today, as the America we once remembered is on life support, the average American is oblivious to the fact that Khrushchev was right.

“The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of ‘liberalism’ they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.” -Norman Thomas, six-time U.S. Presidential candidate for the Socialist Party of America. Interestingly enough, Norman Thomas and Gus Hall, the U.S. Communist Party Candidate, both quit American politics, agreeing that the Republican and Democratic parties had adopted every plank on the Communist/Socialist and they no longer had an alternate party platform on which to run.

Though the Soviet Union did not even exist in the lifetime of the average college student of today, I believe that the communist goals they had prepared for America are not only alive and well, but rather key components of their very own thinking.

America has become the socialist nation Russian leaders had hoped for a half-century ago… And the transformation has occurred peacefully and has even been welcomed by most.

Below you will find a copy of actual Congressional minutes from January 1963. The notes, entered into the record by Florida Congressman A.S. Herlong, Jr., outline the goals of communists, laid out in a recent study:

Though some of these goals were never realized, many more have not only been realized, but are now part of mainstream American society (Since the USSR is no longer a world player, the truly shocking goals begin with #11):
1. U.S. acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war.
2. U.S. willingness to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war.
3. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.
4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.
5. Extension of long-term loans to Russia and Soviet satellites.
6. Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination.
7. Grant recognition of Red China. Admission of Red China to the U.N.
8. Set up East and West Germany as separate states in spite of Khrushchev’s promise in 1955 to settle the German question by free elections under supervision of the U.N.
9. Prolong the conferences to ban atomic tests because the United States has agreed to suspend tests as long as negotiations are in progress.
10. Allow all Soviet satellites individual representation in the U.N.
11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces. (Some Communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the U.N. as by Moscow. Sometimes these two centers compete with each other as they are now doing in the Congo.)
12. Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party.
13. Do away with all loyalty oaths.
14. Continue giving Russia access to the U.S. Patent Office.
15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.
16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.
17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers’ associations. Put the party line in textbooks.
18. Gain control of all student newspapers.
19. Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are under Communist attack.
20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policymaking positions.
21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.
22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to “eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms.”
23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. “Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art.”
24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them “censorship” and a violation of free speech and free press.
25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.
26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.”
27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with “social” religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity which does not need a “religious crutch.”
28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of “separation of church and state.”
29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.
30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the “common man.”
31. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the “big picture.” Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.
32. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture–education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.
33. Eliminate all laws or procedures which interfere with the operation of the Communist apparatus.
34. Eliminate the House Committee on Un-American Activities.
35. Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI.
36. Infiltrate and gain control of more unions.
37. Infiltrate and gain control of big business.
38. Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand [or treat].
39. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.
40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.
41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.
42. Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special-interest groups should rise up and use ["]united force["] to solve economic, political or social problems.
43. Overthrow all colonial governments before native populations are ready for self-government.
44. Internationalize the Panama Canal.
45. Repeal the Connally reservation so the United States cannot prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction [over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction] over nations and individuals alike.